Solar Energy News  
Experts question whether Afghan troop surge can work

by Staff Writers
Washington (AFP) July 17, 2008
The Pentagon is pushing for more troops to go to Afghanistan but experts question whether a new "surge" can shut down the insurgency flourishing in Pakistan's safe havens.

"That's a totally open question," said Michael O'Hanlon, an expert at the Brookings Institution.

US commanders in Afghanistan have asked for 10,000 more combat troops for what until recently was thought of as a forgotten war. US Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Wednesday he wanted to send more forces "sooner rather than later."

The push comes on the back of a "surge" strategy in Iraq that succeeded in bringing down violence dramatically over an 18 month period with the addition of five combat brigades.

But Pentagon officials acknowledge that what worked in Iraq cannot be neatly translated to a very different situation in Afghanistan, which is larger, poorer, more populous and contains some of the world's most difficult fighting terrain.

"The environment in Iraq and the environment in Afghanistan are very different. The enemy in Iraq and the enemy in Afghanistan are very different -- the terrain, the conditions," said Bryan Whitman, a Pentagon spokesman.

"There is a certain amount of planning that takes place, and appropriately takes place, for the environment, and the mission and the enemy you are going to be deployed against," he said.

Pentagon officials have not said how many additional forces can be mustered or what they will do with them, but it's clear that a top priority is to stop the flow of fighters into Afghanistan from safe havens in Pakistan.

"The border there is a really critical issue that we're going to have to solve," Admiral Michael Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said Wednesday.

The Pakistani government, however, has resisted US entreaties to do more to control their side of the border, pulling army troops out of the region under a truce struck with militants in March.

"It's very clear that additional (US) troops will have a big impact on insurgents coming across that border," Mullen asserted Wednesday.

But others are doubtful that more US combat troops can seal an ill-defined border that runs through towering mountains and open desert.

"You cannot seal borders," British Defence Minister Des Browne said here last week.

"We could not seal 26 miles of border between north and south of Ireland with 40,000 troops. Please do not demand of Pakistan and Afghanistan that they they try to seal the many hundreds of kilometers of mountainous border between these two countries," he said.

Moreover, sending more troops into a country with a long history of resistance to outside forces may further inflame the insurgency, some experts warn.

"The past history is that a large footprint in Afghanistan has engendered a quick turn by locals," said Sam Brannen, an analyst at the Center for International and Security Studies.

"There is a historical threat there that says that Afghans don't like large occupying forces," he said.

"If this was a NATO surge, I would tell you it's exactly what the country needs but a US surge is risky," he said.

The NATO-led International Security Assistance Force has grown from 37,500 in January 2007 to 53,000 today, and there are now about 70,000 foreign troops in Afghanistan, including American forces not under ISAF.

The Afghan National Army is supposed to grow to 80,000 troops by the end of this year, but that pales in comparison to the 566,000 security force members in Iraq.

And despite the growth in the international forces, the insurgency also has spread over the past two years, gaining intensity and lethality with tactics borrowed from Iraq -- roadside bombs, suicide attacks, and ambushes.

An assault on a combat outpost Sunday that left nine US soldiers dead showed new levels of sophistication that US military officials believe has come from improved training inside Pakistan.

"I think one of the reasons you add forces now is it's hard to know what else to do," said O'Hanlon.

"You hope that it will make a meaningful difference, but you also hoped that about the previous increment of forces, which as you know has already gone up quite a bit in Afghanistan compared to earlier years.

"There is no way to know whether this 10,000 would be the magic 10,000 to get us over the hump," he said.

Related Links
News From Across The Stans



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Analysis: Afghan-Turkmen ties deepen
Washington (UPI) Jul 17, 2008
After the 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, the wretched country plunged into 29 years of armed strife with no end in sight. Now, however, a neighboring country is set to make a significant contribution to the standard of living of Afghans in the northwest of the country in a project that likely will prove so popular that even the resurgent Taliban will likely not attack it. In a week in which nine American soldiers were killed and 15 wounded, any news is good news.







  • British Energy says takeover talks continue
  • Analysis: Nuclear revival without Germany
  • New French giant GDF Suez interested in British nuclear sites
  • Russia's Uranium Breakthrough

  • Australia's Rudd hits out at critics of carbon trading scheme
  • Australia to set up carbon trading scheme by 2010
  • CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship Launched
  • In Namibian desert, the heat is on to address climate change

  • Brazil agribusiness wants looser ties to China, India in WTO talks
  • River Damming Leads To Dramatic Decline In Native Fish Numbers
  • China trade deficit in food up 14-fold: report
  • China to urgently boost GM crop development

  • Sea Turtle Nesting Season In Los Cabos Now Underway
  • International Spotlight On Tiny Worms
  • The Exotic Side Of Veterinary Science
  • Incentives For Carbon Sequestration May Not Protect Species

  • NASA Plans To Test Space Shuttle Replacement In Spring 2009
  • ATK Receives Contract For US Air Force Sounding Rocket Contract
  • SpaceX Conducts Static Test Firing Of Next Falcon 1 Rocket
  • Pratt And Whitney Rocketdyne Contract Option For Solar Thermal Propulsion Rocket Engine

  • Nuclear Power In Space - Part 2
  • Outside View: Nuclear future in space
  • Nuclear Power In Space

  • ESA To Consult The Science Community On Earth Explorer Selection
  • NASA's Deep Impact Films Earth As An Alien World
  • ESA Launches Program In Support Of Earth Observation Science
  • Astrium Purchases Majority Share In Spot Image

  • Satellite Users Group Opposes UTC Request
  • EchoStar XI Satellite Deploys Solar Arrays On Schedule
  • Eutelsat W5 Satellite Performance Stabilised
  • Integral To Provide Carrier Monitoring And Interference Detection Capability To Telenor

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright Space.TV Corporation. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space.TV Corp on any Web page published or hosted by Space.TV Corp. Privacy Statement