. Solar Energy News .




.
NUKEWARS
In Israel, speculation over strike on Iran grows
by Staff Writers
Jerusalem (AFP) Nov 3, 2011

NATO says 'no intention' to intervene in Iran
Brussels (AFP) Nov 3, 2011 - NATO has no intention of intervening in Iran and backs a diplomatic solution to the nuclear dispute, the alliance's chief said Thursday, after reports of a debate in Israel over launching an attack.

"Let me stress that NATO has no intention whatsoever to intervene in Iran and NATO is not engaged as an alliance in the Iran question," Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said at a news conference.

"We support of course the international efforts to pursue political and diplomatic solutions to the Iran problem," he said, urging Tehran to comply with UN Security Council resolutions demanding a halt in nuclear activities.

Israel's Haaretz newspaper reported Wednesday that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was seeking cabinet support for a military strike on Iran, after days of speculation about plans for an attack.

London's Guardian newspaper reported that Britain's armed forces were stepping up contingency plans in the event the United States opted for military action against Iran.

Thursday's edition cited unnamed defence ministry contacts as saying they believed Washington might rush forward plans for missile strikes on Iranian facilities -- and might ask for British military help.


Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is seeking cabinet support for a military strike on Iran, the Haaretz newspaper reported on Wednesday, after days of speculation about plans for an attack.

The report, citing a senior Israeli official, said Netanyahu was working with Defence Minister Ehud Barak to win support from sceptical members of the cabinet who oppose attacking Iranian nuclear facilities.

It came after days of renewed public discussion among Israeli commentators about the possibility that the Jewish state would take unilateral military action against Iran.

Israel has also successfully tested what local media called a "ballistic missile", which a defence ministry official described to AFP as a long-scheduled "test firing of the rocket-propulsion system".

Haaretz said that Netanyahu and Barak had already scored a significant win by convincing Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman to throw his support behind a strike.

But the newspaper cited the senior Israeli official as saying those opposed to an attack still held "a small advantage" in the cabinet.

Media reports say there is also opposition from army and intelligence chiefs.

But such action by Israel would not be without precedent.

In June 1981, Israeli planes bombed and destroyed an uncompleted French nuclear reactor in Iraq, arguing it could have been used to make atomic weapons. The attack provoked an international outcry.

The United States, which like Israel has declined to rule out military action to prevent Iran developing a nuclear weapons capability, refused to be drawn on the Israeli media reports.

"I'm not going to respond to that kind of speculation," White House spokesman Jay Carney said.

"We remain focused on a diplomatic channel here, a diplomatic course in terms of dealing with Iran."

Iran's military chief, General Hassan Firouzabadi, warned on Wednesday that his country would "punish" any Israeli strike against it.

"We consider any threat -- even those with low probability and distant -- as a definite threat. We are on full alert," he said, Fars news agency reported.

"With the right equipment, we are ready to punish them and make them regret (committing) any mistake," he said.

On Monday, Barak was forced to deny media reports that he and Netanyahu had already decided to launch an attack against Iran over the opposition of military and intelligence chiefs.

"It doesn't take a great genius to understand that in 2011 in Israel, two people cannot decide to act by themselves," he said.

On Tuesday, Barak appeared to suggest in remarks to parliament that Israel could be forced to act alone against Iran.

"A situation could be created in the Middle East in which Israel must defend its vital interests in an independent fashion, without necessarily having to reply on other forces, regional or otherwise," he said.

Haaretz said no decision had yet been taken on any military strike, and that a November 8 report from the International Atomic Energy Agency nuclear watchdog would have a "decisive effect" on the decision-making process.

The newspaper also cited Western specialists as saying any attack on Iran during the winter would be almost impossible because of thick cloud cover.

A report from London's Guardian newspaper meanwhile suggested Britain's armed forces were looking at contingency plans in the event the US opted for military action against Iran.

Thursday's edition cited unnamed defence ministry contacts as saying they believed Washington might rush forward plans for missile strikes on Iranian facilities -- and might ask for British military help.

The Guardian's sources had also been told that the IAEA report could be a "game changer".

Israel has consistently warned all options remain on the table when it comes to Iran's nuclear programme, which the Jewish state and Western governments fear masks a drive for nuclear weapons.

Iran denies any such ambition and insists its nuclear programme is for power generation and medical purposes only.

Related Links
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
All about missiles at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com




.
.
Get Our Free Newsletters Via Email
...
Buy Advertising Editorial Enquiries


Israelis evenly split on striking Iran: poll
Jerusalem (AFP) Nov 3, 2011 - Israelis are virtually evenly divided on whether the Jewish state should launch a pre-emptive strike on Iran, with 41 percent in favour and 39 percent opposed, a poll published on Thursday found.

The survey published by Israeli daily Haaretz showed opinion was statistically evenly split, although 20 percent said they were still undecided.

The poll, which surveyed 495 people and had a margin of error of 4.6 percent, comes as speculation in Israel grows about a possible strike on Iranian nuclear facilities.

Israel and Western governments fear Iran is seeking an atomic bomb, but Tehran says its nuclear facilities are for peaceful civil energy and medical purposes only.

On Wednesday, Haaretz reported that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Ehud Barak were seeking to win support from the Israeli cabinet for a strike on Iran.

The Haaretz poll on Thursday showed solid public support for both Barak and Netanyahu, with 52 percent of respondents saying they trusted the men "on the Iranian issue" compared to 31 percent who said they did not and 11 percent who said they had no opinion.

Speculation about a possible attack on Iran has been growing in Israel in the wake of several days of reports about political moves and military exercises that could be related to a planned strike.

On Wednesday, Israel carried out a test of a rocket-propulsion system that media reports said was capable of launching a ballistic missile.

Israeli officials said the exercise was long scheduled and unrelated to any recent media speculation about Iran.



.

. Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle



NUKEWARS
Israel tests rocket amid talk of possible Iran strike
Jerusalem (AFP) Nov 2, 2011
Israel on Wednesday successfully tested what local media called a "ballistic missile" as speculation in the Jewish state grew over the possibility of an attack on Iranian nuclear facilities. A defence ministry official described the launch to AFP as a "test firing of the rocket-propulsion system" which he said had long been scheduled. He did not give further details. Haaretz newspaper, w ... read more


NUKEWARS
Genome-scale Network of Rice Genes to Speed the Development of Biofuel Crops

Lincoln Increases Trucking Fleet to Expand Regional Biofuels Service

Animal Farm Powers Village by Alfagy

US Biofuel Production Increase: Fact or Wishful Thinking

NUKEWARS
Is that a robot in your suitcase?

Look, no hands -- robot uses gecko power to climb walls

Japan's Toyota unveils nursing robots

Robotic bug gets wings, sheds light on evolution of flight

NUKEWARS
Mortenson Construction Builds Its Fifth Wind Facility In Illinois

Chinese Wind Market To Overtake Germany by 2018, Second Only to the UK

Huhne slams green energy 'naysayers'

Wind farm development can be powerful, as long as proper design is implemented

NUKEWARS
Toyota, Nissan extend Thai flood production halts

Volkswagen takes last hurdle in acquisition of MAN

S. Korea's Kia Motors to build new plant in China

Seeking Relief From The Parking Wars

NUKEWARS
U.S.military group urges slash in oil use

Caudrilla: Shale drilling caused quakes

Vietnam diplomat warns of war in South China Sea

Dim prospects for Obama's Plan B in gulf

NUKEWARS
Graphene grows better on certain copper crystals

New method of growing high-quality graphene promising for next-gen technology

Giant flakes make graphene oxide gel

Amorphous diamond, a new super-hard form of carbon created under ultrahigh pressure

NUKEWARS
First renewable energy exchange opens in Amsterdam

Energy grid for ASEAN nations?

Pakistan mulls importing electricity from India

Japanese urged to wrap up warm to save winter power

NUKEWARS
DR Congo seeks to keep its huge green lung breathing

Forests not keeping pace with climate change

Niger capital's 'green lung' facing suffocation

Savannas, forests in a battle of the biomes


.

The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2011 - Space Media Network. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement