![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() by Staff Writers San Francisco (AFP) Oct 17, 2015
A US jury on Friday declared that Apple owes $234 million in damages for infringing on mobile chip technology patented by University of Wisconsin researchers. "This is a case where the hard work of our university researchers and the integrity of patenting and licensing discoveries has prevailed," said Carl Gulbrandsen, managing director of the nonprofit Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation which brought the suit. "The jury recognized the seminal computer processing work that took place on our campus." Apple declined to comment on the jury award but told AFP that it planned to appeal the outcome to a higher court. The California-based technology titan maintained throughout the civil trial that the patent at issue is not valid and the company did not infringe on it. "Although patent verdicts like this one are typically appealed, we hope to continue to work with Apple to resolve this matter and build a stronger relationship between our two institutions," Gulbrandsen said. WARF argued in court that Apple chips used in some of its popular mobile devices incorporated technology patented in 1998 for improving efficiency and performance of microprocessors. The inventors were identified as Andreas Moshovos, Scott Breach, Terani Vijaykumar, and Gurindar Sohi, who did research work at the university. "We believed our technology was ahead of its time," Sohi said in a release. "Almost two decades ago we tried to anticipate how computers would need to operate today. Our team invested the equivalent of more than 11 years of work to solve this problem." The foundation manages patents for the university with a mission to support research there, according to court documents. At issue in the case were A7, A8 and A8X chip designs used in some newer model iPhones as well as in several versions of the iPad, according to WARF. The jury on Tuesday sided with the university research association on all nine claims in the case, and said disagreed with Apple's contention that the patent was invalid. A damages phase of the trial ended Friday with the panel putting a figure on how much Apple should pay. WARF filed the suit against Apple last year in federal court in Wisconsin. "The jury did an incredible job grappling with the complex technology, and we're grateful for their effort," WARF general counsel Michael Falk said in a release. WARF is reported to be taking aim at newer Apple mobile chips using the same patent.
Related Links Satellite-based Internet technologies
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |