Solar Energy News  
Keeping The Tu-95 Operational In The 21st Century

The combination of air-launched cruise missile technology -- which was already fitted to the Tu-95 nearly 20 years ago -- and the aircraft's exceptionally long range, low rate of fuel consumption and, most of all, its unmatched aerial endurance, has made it ideal as a flying platform that can stay aloft for 18 to 19 hours at a time, carrying up to six KH-55 (NATO designation AS-15 Kent) cruise missiles in its capacious bomb bay, immune from any pre-emptive nuclear attack.
by Martin Sieff
Washington (UPI) Oct 27, 2008
Who could have imagined, when the Soviet Tupolev Tu-95 strategic bomber first flew in 1951, that it would be one of the centerpieces of Russia's nuclear war forces in the first decade of the 21st century, 57 years later?

For the Tu-95MS (NATO designation Bear) was one of two centerpiece strategic bombers, along with the spectacular supersonic Tupolev Tu-160 White Swan (NATO designation Blackjack) in Russia's huge Stability-2008 military exercises in September.

From Oct. 6-12, the front-line long-range strategic nuclear bombers have carried out a new series of major weeklong exercises, the Russian air force announced last week.

Russia is still producing new Tu-160 Blackjacks, and no wonder: They fly twice as fast as a B-2 "Stealth Bomber" and can carry twice the payload. But the continued relevance of the enormous, lumbering Tu-95 is astonishing. It flies at less than one-third the speed of the Tu-160 Blackjack, and its engines are powered by a technology that U.S. Air Force planners had written off as a joke 65 years ago.

When the Tu-95 first took to the air, the U.S. Air Force was already flying vastly faster, turbojet-powered Boeing B-47 Stratojets and had the famous Boeing B-52 Stratofortress coming down the line. Compared to them, the Tu-95 looked like it belonged in Jurassic Park.

But as we have noted, the combination of air-launched cruise missile technology -- which was already fitted to the Tu-95 nearly 20 years ago -- and the aircraft's exceptionally long range, low rate of fuel consumption and, most of all, its unmatched aerial endurance, has made it ideal as a flying platform that can stay aloft for 18 to 19 hours at a time, carrying up to six KH-55 (NATO designation AS-15 Kent) cruise missiles in its capacious bomb bay, immune from any pre-emptive nuclear attack.

This capability and longevity therefore put the Tu-95 in the remarkable category of "Cinderella" aircraft that have proved war winners in roles very different from the ones for which they were originally conceived.

Another was the British World War II Hawker Typhoon fighter bomber. Originally conceived as an air superiority fighter, it was just too large, too unstable and too un-maneuverable for that role.

But the Typhoon unexpectedly found two far more important missions: It proved to be the greatest ground support tactical attack aircraft the British and U.S. Air Forces ever had in World War II, and it played a decisive role in interdicting and destroying the German army in the West in the Battle of Normandy in 1944.

The citizens of London had even more reason to love the huge, ugly but super-fast Typhoon: It proved the only Allied combat aircraft capable of intercepting and shooting down the thousands of V-1 "Flying Bomb" vengeance weapons that Germany was firing at the British capital in 1944. When the Typhoon pilots ran out of ammunition, they flew their planes alongside the jet-propelled, unmanned Flying Bombs and tipped them over with their wings to crash harmlessly in the English countryside below.

Like the Tu-95, the British Fairey Swordfish biplane seemed like an obsolete joke by 1941. Where sleek fighter planes of the day already could fly at 350 miles per hour without breaking a sweat, the Swordfish was lucky to make 100 miles per hour and often had to fly more slowly than that to conserve fuel. Against a heavy Atlantic headwind, the ungainly, ugly little old aircraft often just appeared to be standing still.

But in May 1941, the sophisticated, state-of-the-art anti-aircraft systems of the German battleship Bismarck, the most accurate and powerful warship in the world, proved useless against those same little lumbering, ungainly Swordfish. They were so inconceivably slow that the settings for the Bismarck's bristling anti-aircraft armaments couldn't be adjusted to compensate for them.

The last, crucial Swordfish attack from the aircraft carrier Ark Royal jammed the Bismarck's rudder and wrecked its steering mechanism, making it a sitting duck to be finished off by British battleships the next day. Not a single old biplane was even seriously damaged in the attack.

These examples teach the sobering importance of not trusting too much in high-tech wonder weapons, and encouraging national defense contractors to keep their production lines and maintenance depots open and prepared to provide un-sexy, low-tech and improbable weapons of every kind to wage and win wars.

Like its American near contemporary, the Boeing B-52 Stratofortress, the old Tu-95 Bear is fulfilling a major strategic role in the 21st century that its brilliant designer Andrei Tupolev could not have imagined back in 1950 when he reluctantly concluded that Russian turbojet technology could not give his new bomber the range it needed.

However, what was old-fashioned and cause for contempt in 1950 looks more formidable than ever in 2008. As the author of the Book of Ecclesiastes sagely warned thousands of years ago, "The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, but time and chance happen to them all."

Related Links
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
All about missiles at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Aging Tu-95 Nuclear Missile Platform Offers New Strategic Threat
Washington (UPI) Oct 23, 2008
Russia's venerable Tupolev Tu-95 bomber is a gigantic, lumbering and slow behemoth that flies with turbine-driven propellers. It has an engine technology that the U.S. Air Force wouldn't be caught dead with since before 1950. So how come it now poses a formidable strategic threat to the United States and its NATO allies in the 21st century?







  • South Korean reactor stops due to mechanical problem
  • Jordan signs nuclear deal with South Korea
  • Uranium shipment arrives safely in Russia: Slovenia
  • India probing radioactive lift button exports

  • Potent Greenhouse Gas More Prevalent Than Assumed
  • Sarkozy's carbon footprint as big as 1,000 Frenchmen: report
  • Impacts Of Climate Change On Lakes
  • Cloud-Hopping In The Pacific Improves Climate Predictions

  • EU agrees to tougher protection of tuna stocks
  • China knew of tainted eggs in September: official
  • Beijing Promises Better Food Standards As Crisis Spreads
  • China debates tighter food safety law spurred by milk scandal

  • Study Sheds New Light On Dolphin Coordination During Predation
  • Shifting To Life On Land
  • Were Dinosaurs Truly The First Great Migrators
  • Walker's World: Year of the frog

  • More design flaws found in Ares I rocket
  • Copenhagen Suborbitals Tests Hybrid Rocket
  • Successful First Test For Vega's Zefiro 9-A Solid-Fuel Rocket Motor
  • Brazil hopes to launch satellite rocket in 2011: report

  • Nuclear Power In Space - Part 2
  • Outside View: Nuclear future in space
  • Nuclear Power In Space

  • GeoEye Releases First Image Collected By GeoEye-1
  • Maps Shed Light On CO2's Global Nature
  • 2008 Ozone Hole Larger Than Last Year
  • Smog Blog For Central America And Caribbean Debuts

  • The Sky Isn't Falling And That's A Problem
  • Sarantel Antenna Featured In New Iridium 9555 Satellite Phone
  • NASA Launches IBEX Mission To Outer Solar System
  • MSV Awarded Patents For Next-Gen Satellite-Terrestrial Comms Network

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright Space.TV Corporation. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space.TV Corp on any Web page published or hosted by Space.TV Corp. Privacy Statement