Solar Energy News  
Pakistan, India can't afford war: analysts

The new Balkans?

Russia 'extremely concerned' over India-Pakistan tensions
Russia on Saturday said it was "extremely concerned" about the build-up of troops on the India-Pakistan border, warning that tensions between the two nuclear foes had reached a dangerous level. "Russia is extremely concerned by the news that on both sides of the border there is a build-up of troops and military equipment," the foreign ministry said in a statement. "The tension in this region has reached a dangerous level. There are worrying reports that New Delhi and Islamabad are not ruling out the use of force against each other," it added. "Russia calls on India and Pakistan to show the maximum restraint and not allow the situation on the border to develop into one of force," it added, saying that negotiations were the only way out of the crisis. Pakistan on Friday said the military had moved troops from the tribal areas near Afghanistan, where they are fighting Taliban and Al-Qaeda militants, to the eastern border with India as a "minimum security" measure. Senior Pakistani security and defence officials described the troop movements as "limited" but Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh summoned his military chiefs for a strategy session. India also advised its nationals to avoid travel to Pakistan, saying it was unsafe for them to be in the country. India and Pakistan have fought three major wars since their 1947 independence from British rule.
by Staff Writers
Islamabad (AFP) Dec 28, 2008
The risk of war between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan has increased with the redeployment of troops along the common border, but neither can afford the cost of such a conflict, analysts say.

The two sides have raised tensions by whipping up war hype for domestic reasons since the Mumbai attacks last month, but must step back from the brink to focus on more pressing issues such as the spread of militancy, they say.

A war is even less likely as the United States, a key ally of both Islamabad and New Delhi, would suffer as a result, the experts warn.

"The risk of war has increased with troop mobilisation," Hasan Askari, a political analyst and former head of the political science department at the University of Punjab, told AFP.

"However this does not necessarily mean that the two countries will go to war. There are a number of considerations which impel the two sides not to cross the red line."

Senior Pakistani security and defence officials said Friday the military had moved a "limited number" of troops fighting Taliban militants in the tribal areas near Afghanistan to the Indian border as a "minimum security" measure.

This followed intelligence intercepts indicating that India had put its forces on notice to move to the border and cancelled all leave, they said. An Indian army spokesman however told AFP that no troops had been moved.

Retired Pakistani general Talat Masood said: "While the political and military leadership in both countries don't want war to happen, this action-and-reaction phenomenon is promoting escalation."

Both sides say they do not want war but would respond if attacked.

Indian Foreign Minister Pranab Mukherjee has said that "all options" are open since the Mumbai attacks, which New Delhi has blamed on Pakistan-based militants. The attacks left 172 people dead.

"By declaring all options are on the table, New Delhi has pushed Pakistan toward a limited war scenario -- something which Islamabad was reluctant to contemplate a couple of weeks ago," defence analyst Riffat Hussain told AFP.

Hussain, the head of strategic studies at Islamabad's Quaid-e-Azam University, said any escalation could lead to a catastrophic point of no return that no one could envision.

"As nuclear-armed adversaries, India and Pakistan cannot afford any kind of shooting war between them," he said.

Analysts say while tensions in South Asia may persist for some time, they will eventually be defused because of international interest in the region, especially in Washington.

Askari said US and Western interests in Afghanistan would be "threatened" if Pakistan were to pull significant numbers of troops out of the tribal areas, as it would expose foreign forces to more cross-border militant attacks.

Such a withdrawal would also endanger the flow of supplies to NATO and US forces in Afghanistan, as the roads through northwest Pakistan would not be secure, he said.

Masood agreed, saying: "Pakistan should be focusing more on the tribal territories to fight Al-Qaeda and control Talibanisation. Any diversion will be disastrous for the country, for the region and for international peace."

New Delhi-based security expert C. Uday Bhaskar said Pakistani troop movements "seem to be part of the army's strategy to obfuscate the real issue of the (Mumbai) attacks."

"It is a signal to the Americans that they should not push the Pakistani army beyond a point. Although it seems like an India-Pakistan issue, the operative part is Pakistan-US ties," Bhaskar told AFP.

Hussain warned that India's tough stance would backfire if maintained, as it would embolden the forces of extremism in Pakistan -- a price neither country could afford to pay.

"That would not only imperil the internal security of Pakistan but also permanently damage prospects of a lasting peace between the two states," he said.

Related Links
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
All about missiles at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Russia may place nuclear missiles in Belarus: report
Moscow (AFP) Dec 23, 2008
Russia may place nuclear-capable Topol missiles in neighbouring Belarus as a response to a controversial US missile shield in eastern Europe, a Russian defence ministry source was quoted as saying Tuesday.







  • SKorea announces 28.5 bln dollar energy plan
  • Areva, Mitsubishi announce nuclear fuel tie-up
  • US Bechtel wins Egypt nuclear power contract
  • New cost overrun for Finnish nuclear plant: Areva

  • Erratic weather hurts Britain's wildlife
  • Tropics cooled by volcanic eruptions
  • Greenland's Glaciers Losing Ice Faster This Year Than Last Year
  • Global warming causing more tropical storms: NASA

  • Taiwan home-grown food firms get boost after China scandal
  • Chinese dairy firms agree to pay compensation for melamine victims: report
  • Ex-head of China milk-powder firm could face death penalty: lawyer
  • Agricultural Bank of China to be stock-holding company: report

  • Spider Love: Little Guys Get Lots More
  • Migratory birds face peril in Lebanon sanctuary
  • Study: Flora not flourishing in tropics
  • More than 1,000 species discovered in Mekong: WWF

  • Space Pioneers Return For Thor Program's 50th Anniversary
  • Stennis to test Taurus II rocket engine
  • Aerojet Bipropellant Engine Sets New Performance Record
  • Cult spacecraft Part One: The Little Spaceplane That Couldn't

  • Nuclear Power In Space - Part 2
  • Outside View: Nuclear future in space
  • Nuclear Power In Space

  • Infoterra Supports Mapping For Dakar Rally With ERDAS Software
  • New Satellite Data Reveal Impact Of Olympic Pollution Controls
  • Japanese seek to scrap Google's Street View
  • Mission Operations Readiness Review For NPOESS Prep Project Completed

  • New polymer coatings prevent corrosion
  • Solutions Created For Two NASA Missions
  • Eliminating Space Debris - The Quest Continues
  • Space Foundation Recognizes Three GMV Products As Certified Space Technologies

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright Space.TV Corporation. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space.TV Corp on any Web page published or hosted by Space.TV Corp. Privacy Statement