Solar Energy News  
The Russian US ABM Deadlock Continues Part Two

disclaimer: image is for illustration purposes only
by Andrei Kislyakov
Moscow (UPI) Jun 13, 2008
There is one contradiction in the rhetoric of Russian military leaders. For more than two years, they have been saying that Russia's strategic interests will be threatened if the United States deploys missile defense elements in Europe or elsewhere.

Until recently, they emphasized that Russia would make an asymmetric response to the U.S. plans by consolidating and upgrading its nuclear missile potential. Even if old, it is still reliable and well-tested.

But Lt. Gen. Yevgeny Buzhinsky, deputy chief of the Russian Defense Ministry's main department of international cooperation, said in late May, on the eve of summer vacations: "We are thinking about asymmetric measures, but I cannot specify them. We are in the army, and we think in terms of technical potentialities in order to minimize our losses."

This is strange, because strategic nuclear weapons had been mentioned as an alternative to missile defense by the president, the defense minister and the chief of the General Staff. Now something seems to have changed.

It is becoming clear that even 100 missile interceptors in Poland could not threaten hundreds of Russian missiles, not to mention 10. The United States is not going to wage a nuclear war. However, conventional arms or precision weapons based on multi-echelon space vehicles are another matter.

It is space-based missile defense, now being developed by the United States, that will give it limitless opportunities to conduct comprehensive surveillance and deal strikes at huge territories in no time at all.

The Russian general is absolutely right to talk about technical potentialities. The problem is that, for the time being at least, we do not have them. We cannot parry a massive attack by precision missiles and bombs unless we develop a powerful combined system to protect ourselves against missiles and space-based weapons -- air and space defense.

Earlier this year Russian Air Force Commander Col. Gen. Alexander Zelin admitted that "air and space defense elements are in critical condition." It is not even clear today under which command the future air and space defense system should be placed. The situation with weapons is no better.

The S-400 Triumph is the only missile system that can counter an air or space attack. But it is very far from a real triumph. It is not even deployed in several positioning areas. For the time being, only one missile defense regiment, deployed in Elektrostal, just east of Moscow, has received it.

To sum up, Russia will not be able to protect its major administrative and industrial centers against an attack from the air or space. This is a source of concern for Russia's political and military leaders. American missile defense is yet another irritant.

(Andrei Kislyakov is a political commentator for RIA Novosti. This article is reprinted by permission of RIA Novosti. The opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.)

(United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.)

Related Links
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
All about missiles at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


US to press NATO allies on missile defence options
Brussels (AFP) June 12, 2008
US Defense Secretary Robert Gates will press NATO ministers to agree on options for a missile system capable of protecting all allies against Iranian missile strikes, a senior US official said Thursday.







  • Romanian operator says IAEA 'positive' on nuke plant
  • Areva reaches deal to boost uranium production in Kazakhstan
  • Ukraine reactor stopped after water leak: officials
  • Switzerland plans first nuclear power station for 20 years

  • China biggest CO2 emitter last year: Dutch agency
  • UN climate chief spurs talks on new global warming pact
  • Has Global Warming Research Misinterpreted Cloud Behavior
  • Analysis: Senate kills climate change bill

  • EU to shut down industrial bluefin tuna fishing early
  • Drought emergency declared in vital California farmland
  • Different Production Methods For Rice Fortification In Developing Nations
  • China consuming twice what its ecosystems can supply: WWF

  • Taking The Temperature Of The No-Fly Zone
  • Woolly-Mammoth Gene Study Changes Extinction Theory
  • Fossils Found In Tibet By FSU Geologist Revise History Of Elevation And Climate
  • Scientists Examine Ecosystem Connectivity Using Long-Term Studies

  • Orion's New Launch Abort Motor Test Stand Ready For Action
  • Researchers To Upgrade Safety And Performance Of Rocket Fuel
  • NASA chief backs proposal for European spaceship
  • SpaceX And NASA To Improve Mission Critical Software Systems

  • Nuclear Power In Space - Part 2
  • Outside View: Nuclear future in space
  • Nuclear Power In Space

  • NMSU Uses Information Collected In Space To Help Those On The Ground
  • Aster Images Sichuan Earthquake In China
  • Japanese astronaut says Earth is 'beautiful'
  • EarthCARE Earthcare Satellite Contract Signed

  • Students Prepare For Dust Up In Space
  • Microsoft Surface computers hit Las Vegas party scene
  • Measuring How Much Information There Is In The World
  • Paralysed man takes a walk in virtual world

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright Space.TV Corporation. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space.TV Corp on any Web page published or hosted by Space.TV Corp. Privacy Statement