![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() by Staff Writers Washington (AFP) Oct 29, 2020
US President Donald Trump's administration on Thursday removed endangered species protections for the gray wolf, paving the way for the iconic predator to be more widely hunted. The move was slammed by conservation groups, which said that while wolf numbers have partly recovered since the animal was first listed in 1974, they remain "functionally extinct" in the vast majority of their former range. "Today's action reflects the Trump administration's continued commitment to species conservation based on the parameters of the law and the best scientific and commercial data available," said Interior Secretary David Bernhardt. The department added in a statement that the gray wolf population in the lower 48 states is more than 6,000, "greatly exceeding the combined recovery goals for the Northern Rocky Mountains and Western Great Lakes populations." Placing wolves under state control will allow Minnesota, Michigan and Wisconsin to resume hunting and trapping, activities blocked by a 2014 court ruling. All three states are considered battlegrounds in the November 3 election between Trump and Joe Biden, and the president has sought to appeal to rural voters such as hunters and livestock owners. A once highly-feared apex predator, the gray wolf was eliminated across much of the United States by the 1930s through government-sponsored hunting, trapping and poisoning programs. But numbers have increased thanks to protections under the Endangered Species Act. Conservationists argue however that the move to de-list them is premature and wolves have only re-occupied 15 percent of their former range. "This is no 'mission accomplished' moment for wolf recovery," said Kristen Boyles, an attorney for Earthjustice, which called the decision "illegal" and said it would sue the government. "Wolves are only starting to get a toehold in places like Northern California and the Pacific Northwest, and wolves need federal protection to explore habitat in the Southern Rockies and the Northeast. "This delisting decision is what happens when bad science drives bad policy." Last year, 1.8 million Americans wrote comments against delisting when the rule change was proposed. It has also been opposed by 86 members of Congress, and 100 scientists wrote a letter urging the government to reconsider. The science behind the rule change was also disputed by experts in a peer-review report commissioned by the Fish and Wildlife Service itself. British scientist Jane Goodall said in a video message: "Wolves have all the sentience, and emotions, and intelligence perhaps more so than dogs. "How would you feel if your dog was caught in a leg-hold trap, suffering for hours in agony? "How would you feel if your dog was shot, so that its head could be mounted on somebody's wall?" Currently only four states -- Alaska, Montana, Idaho and Wyoming -- allow the public to hunt wolves.
![]() ![]() Accessible healthcare could slow climate change, reverse biodiversity losses Washington DC (UPI) Oct 26, 2020 To protect forests and vulnerable ecosystems, erect healthcare clinics. That's what nonprofit organizers did in Indonesia, where deforestation rates in neighboring Gunung Palung National Park declined dramatically during the first 10 years of the clinic's operation. The affordable healthcare clinic was set up in 2007 by a pair of nonprofits, Alam Sehat Lestari and Health In Harmony. Prior to the arrival of the clinic, the forests of Gunung Palung were shrinking annually as a result of uncontrol ... read more
![]() |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |