. Solar Energy News .




.
IRAQ WARS
US Republicans slam Obama over Iraq withdrawal
by Staff Writers
Washington (AFP) Dec 18, 2011

Romney calls Iraq withdrawal 'precipitous'
Washington (AFP) Dec 18, 2011 - Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney said in an interview aired Sunday that US withdrawal from Iraq is "precipitous" and blamed President Barack Obama for failing to leave some US forces behind.

"I think we're going to find that this president, by not putting in place a status-of-forces agreement with the Iraqi leadership, has pulled our troops out in a precipitous way and we should have left 10-, 20-, 30-thousand personnel there to help transition to the Iraqi's own military capabilities," Romney said in an interview with Fox News Sunday.

Romney comments -- his first appearance on a Sunday talk show in more than two years -- airs after the last US troops crossed out of Iraq into Kuwait, nearly nine years after a US invasion that resulted in the deaths of 4,474 US troops and tens of thousands of Iraqis.

US military commanders advocated leaving a residual US force in the country to train and support the Iraqi military, but Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki refused to extend legal protections to US troops under a status of forces agreement, scotching that option.

Among the unresolved questions raised by the US departure is the degree of Iranian influence over Iraq's Shiite dominated government and how sectarian tensions will play out.

"I'm very concerned in this setting. I hope it works out," Romney said.

Romney has been an on-again, off-again leader in the Republican fight to nominate a candidate to go up against Obama in the November 2012 presidential elections.

Former US envoy to China Jon Huntsman, one of Romney's rivals for the party's presidential nomination and the Republican candidate with the strongest foreign policy credentials, also assailed the withdrawal.

"President Obama's inability to reach a security agreement in Iraq is a product of the administration's failures in the region," said Huntsman spokesman Tim Miller.

"Governor Huntsman would have supported an agreement that left a small troop presence that could have assisted with the training of Iraqi security forces and vital counter-terror efforts," Miller said.


Republican candidates for the White House slammed President Barack Obama on Sunday over the US troop withdrawal from Iraq, warning of greater Iranian clout and violence in the strife-torn country.

"People do not understand how much the Iranians have penetrated Iraq, and that the vacuum we've created will lead to, I think, a very, very unstable and very unpleasant environment in Iraq," former House speaker Newt Gingrich, the current frontrunner for the party's nomination, told CBS television.

Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, Gingrich's chief rival for the party's nod to take on Obama in November 2012 elections, warned on "Fox News Sunday" that the troop withdrawal was "precipitous."

"I think we're going to find that this president, by not putting in place a status of forces agreement with the Iraqi leadership, has pulled our troops out in a precipitous way and we should have left 10-, 20-, 30-thousand personnel there to help transition to the Iraqi's own military capabilities," he said.

"I'm very concerned in this setting. I hope it works out."

The attacks, coming just two weeks before the heartland state of Iowa holds the first Republican nominating contest, seemed to put Obama's critics at odds with a war-weary US public that opposes the war by a two-to-one margin.

"Republicans wont get anywhere if they criticize him for pulling the troops out too fast. The American people are war-weary. That is an understatement," John Feehery, an erstwhile spokesman for former House speaker Dennis Hastert, said on his blog, thefeeherytheory.com.

But Republican primary voters have shown a hunger for a candidate who will take the fight to the embattled Democratic president, whose drive for a second four-year term hinges on perceptions of his handling of the sour US economy.

The Democratic National Committee -- effectively a political arm of the White House -- charged that Romney had "no clear plan" for Iraq and would leave US forces there "indefinitely."

Republicans have noted that the withdrawal, called for under a 2008 accord signed by Obama's Republican predecessor George W. Bush, came after Baghdad and Washington failed to reach a deal allowing a smaller US force to say on.

US military commanders had hoped the residual force would train and support Iraq's fledgling force, but Iraqi political leaders balked at granting US troops legal immunity, a diplomatic impasse Republicans have blamed on Obama.

Republican presidential candidate Jon Huntsman, a former ambassador to China and the Republican candidate with the strongest foreign policy credentials, took aim at Obama over the breakdown in the talks.

"President Obama's inability to reach a security agreement in Iraq is a product of the administration's failures in the region," said Huntsman spokesman Tim Miller.

"Governor Huntsman would have supported an agreement that left a small troop presence that could have assisted with the training of Iraqi security forces and vital counter-terror efforts."

The criticisms came after the last US troops crossed out of Iraq into Kuwait nearly nine years after the March 2003 US invasion to topple dictator Saddam Hussein and hunt for weapons of mass destruction that were never found.

The US public at first split on the war, largely along party lines, then swung sharply against it as claims of Hussein's secret arsenal proved wrong and casualties mounted -- ultimately fueling Obama's historic 2008 White House run.

At last count, the conflict claimed the lives of some 4,474 US troops and tens of thousands of Iraqis, with a financial cost of nearly $1 trillion to the US Treasury.

Recent US public opinion polls have found Americans fearful that Iraq could tip into civil war but deeply pessimistic that a longer US force presence would serve US national security interests and determined to see US troops come home.

"I think we're going to find, to our great sadness, that we've lost several thousand young Americans, and had many thousand more wounded, undertaking a project that we couldn't do," said Gingrich.

Related Links
Iraq: The first technology war of the 21st century




.
.
Get Our Free Newsletters Via Email
...
Buy Advertising Editorial Enquiries


The astronomic costs of the Iraq war
Washington (AFP) Dec 18, 2011 - From the tens of thousands killed and wounded to the hundreds of billions of dollars spent in eight years of conflict, the cost of the Iraq war is astronomic and still growing.

+Human cost

Since the US invasion in March 2003, at least 126,000 Iraqi civilians were killed in the war, according to Boston University professor Neta Crawford. In addition, another 20,000 Iraqi soldiers and police were killed, along with more than 19,000 insurgents. British group IraqBodyCount.org puts the number of documented Iraqi civilian deaths from violence at 104,035 to 113,680.

For the US-led coalition, the Pentagon says the United States lost 4,474 troops, of which 3,518 died in combat. This figure is by far the highest of an invading coalition country. Britain was next, with 179 troops killed, according to the Defense Ministry. Nearly 32,000 American troops were also wounded.

In November, 187 Iraqis were killed by violence, including 112 civilians, 42 policemen and 33 soldiers. This figure compares to 2,087 people killed in January 2007. By comparison, 2,045 people were killed in the first nine months of 2011. These are all according to figures released monthly by the Iraqi ministries of health, interior and defense.

And the United Nations estimates that 1.75 million Iraqis were made refugees by the war, forced to flee to neighboring countries or to displace their families to other parts of the country.

+Troops deployed

At the start of Operation Iraqi Freedom, about 150,000 US troops were stationed in Iraq, supported by 120,000 forces operating outside of the country. Roughly 40,000 British troops were deployed as well during the course of the war.

The US troop presence reached 165,000 at the end of 2006 before President George W. Bush decided on a "surge" of 30,000 reinforcements in a bid to counter spiraling violence.

In September 2010, the US combat mission officially ended and 50,000 American troops remained on the ground to advise and train Iraqi forces as part of the newly dubbed "Operation New Dawn." The last of those US troops have now left Iraq.

+Financial cost

The Pentagon has spent nearly $770 billion since 2003 on operations in Iraq. Categorized as overseas contingency operations, the sum is treated separately from the main defense budget, which has also included some funds for the Iraq war.

The World Bank estimates that Iraq's GDP fell by 41 percent in 2003.

The Iraq war and reconstruction is also projected to have cost US taxpayers $256 million per day from 2003 to 2012, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Any accounting of the war's price tag also has to include billions in US civilian aid to Iraq, as well as the cost of care provided to wounded soldiers and veterans.

US government statistics do not distinguish between veterans who served in Iraq or Afghanistan, as a large number of the 1.25 million veterans were deployed to both wars.

By the end of 2010, the United States had already spent nearly $32 billion on medical treatment for wounded troops and payments for disability pensions, a benefit veterans receive for life.

The future cost of medical care and pensions for veterans will grow exponentially in coming decades. Linda Bilmes, professor at Harvard University, estimates that pensions through 2055 for veterans will reach $346 billion to $469 billion, mainly due to health care costs.

+Other losses

Around 60 percent of the Iraqi National Archives, equivalent to tens of millions of documents, went missing, were damaged or were destroyed as a result of water leaks and a fire at a storage center in the aftermath of the 2003 invasion, according to INA director Saad Iskander.



.

. Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle



IRAQ WARS
US forces quit Iraq nine years on
Iraq-Kuwait Border, Kuwait (AFP) Dec 18, 2011
The last US forces left Iraq and entered Kuwait on Sunday, nearly nine years after launching a divisive war to oust Saddam Hussein, and just as the oil-rich country grapples with renewed political deadlock. The last of roughly 110 vehicles carrying 500-odd troops mostly from the 3rd Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division, crossed the border at 7:38 am (0438 GMT), leaving just 157 military trainers at ... read more


IRAQ WARS
Chemicals and biofuel from wood biomass

Turning Pig Manure into Oil Fosters Sustainability in a Crowded World

US Biofuel Camelina Production Set to Soar

Switchgrass as bioenergy feedstock

IRAQ WARS
New system may one day steer microrobots through blood vessels for disease treatment

ONR Helps Undersea Robots Get the Big Picture

Insect cyborgs may become first responders, search and monitor hazardous environs

Researchers design steady-handed robot for brain surgery

IRAQ WARS
More than twenty UK wind farm sites adopt Natural Power's ForeSite wind forecasting service

Iowa State engineers study how hills, nearby turbines affect wind energy production

Lawrence Livermore ramps up wind energy research

Campbell Scientific selects ZephIR wind lidar technology for US wind market

IRAQ WARS
End of the road as carmaker Saab files for bankruptcy

GM says no to new Saab deal

Japan's Toyota plans record 2012 output: reports

China's Geely to sell sedans in Britain

IRAQ WARS
US in talks with Europe, Arabs on Iran oil embargo: report

EU: Low-carbon future no more costly

New oil leak found in Brazil: officials

Pentagon chief sees close partnership with Libya

IRAQ WARS
Graphene grows better on certain copper crystals

New method of growing high-quality graphene promising for next-gen technology

Giant flakes make graphene oxide gel

Amorphous diamond, a new super-hard form of carbon created under ultrahigh pressure

IRAQ WARS
Quebec launches cap-and-trade program

Americans Bullish That Advanced Energy Can Solve Problems and Strengthen Economy

Carbon capture safe, scientists say

Arsenic in water near coal-fired US plants: monitor

IRAQ WARS
The case of the dying aspens

Little headway in Durban on deforestation: experts

Climate change blamed for dead trees in Africa

Ecologists fume as Brazil Senate OKs forestry reform


.

The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2012 - Space Media Network. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement