 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 by Morris Jones for SpaceWar.com Sydney, Australia (SPX) May 29, 2018
The recent demolition of North Korea's nuclear test site at Punggye-Ri made for good television, but has produced surprisingly little in the way of serious technical analysis. This is understandable, given the way that access to the site was heavily restricted and controlled. But the lack of boffin fodder leaves plenty of room for speculation. There was plenty of theatre to behold. Explosives were used not only on the tunnels but on small buildings that would typically be demolished by more conventional means. The small media pool admitted to the site was allowed to see a short distance inside the tunnels before the detonations. Officially, that's about all we got, apart from a short briefing from the site's military commander (or someone who claimed to be this officer) with an official map of the site. Technical experts were not permitted in the media pool, and attempts to make the reporters into amateur boffins were thwarted. CNN correspondent Will Ripley openly stated on his network that radiation detectors brought with the media pool had been confiscated by North Korean officials. This denied the outside world some technical data, but it also compromised attempts to monitor the radiation exposure of the visiting personnel for health reasons. We still don't really know how deep the explosives were placed in the tunnels, or how far they have really collapsed. Nor did we really learn anything more about the overall architecture of the site, which has been scrutinized extensively by satellites. This analyst has no Deep Throat sources, but suspects that deeper analysis is taking place in less open areas. Clothing and equipment brought to the site could potentially trap small amounts of radioactive particles. A forensic swabbing of this material, followed by analysis with a mass spectrometer and other tools, could be productive. Similar processes occur at airports, when baggage and clothing is tested for explosives. Analysts could obtain a "fingerprint" of the fissile material used in the nuclear tests, allowing such North Korean material to be identified elsewhere. This could be useful if this material is exported or stolen. The "fingerprint" would include the ratios of different radioisotopes and well as other materials. One critical issue would be the potential presence of uranium signatures. North Korea is known to operate uranium enrichment gear, presumably to produce uranium-based nuclear weapons. But we are not sure if uranium has ever been used in any North Korean nuclear test. Most, if not all, are suspected to have used plutonium generated in the Yongbyon nuclear reactor. Attempts to detect radioisotopes from the more recent North Korean tests in the atmosphere have been unsuccessful. Thus, the potential use of uranium is one of the most pressing unanswered questions. It's possible that no uranium will be detected. But that would not necessarily mean that North Korea does not have some form of uranium bomb. A simple but reliable uranium bomb can be assembled without actual testing. That was done in the Manhattan Project. The first actual detonation of this device was over Hiroshima. Dr Morris Jones is an Australian space analyst who has written for spacedaily.com since 1999. Email morrisjonesNOSPAMhotmail.com. Replace NOSPAM with @ to send email. Dr Jones will answer media inquiries.
Trump and Kim raise summit hopes after days of brinkmanship Seoul (AFP) May 27, 2018 North Korean leader Kim Jong Un is committed to "complete" denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula and to a landmark summit with US President Donald Trump, South Korea's leader said Sunday, as Trump announced that plans for the meeting are moving along "very nicely". The latest conciliatory declarations capped a turbulent few days of diplomatic brinkmanship that had sent tensions soaring. Trump rattled a sabre on Thursday by cancelling the planned June 12 meeting with Kim in Singapore, citing ... read more
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |
del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Google
